OUTILS FROIDS
  • Société
    • OF Conseil
    • Christophe Deschamps
  • Prestations
    • Formation
    • Conseil
    • Conférences
  • Publications
    • Livres
      • Le nouveau management de l’information. La gestion des connaissances au coeur de l’entreprise 2.0.
      • La boîte à outils de l’intelligence économique
      • Organisez vos données personnelles. L’essentiel du PKM
    • Base de connaissances
    • Newsletter hebdomadaire d’Outils Froids
    • Les découvertes hebdomadaires d’Outils Froids
  • Contact
22 novembre 2004 par Christophe Deschamps

Documentalistes vs Technologie

Documentalistes vs Technologie
22 novembre 2004 par Christophe Deschamps

RessourcesInfoDoc

Cet article paru sur le site du eContent Institute donne des arguments en faveur des documentalistes dans leur difficile lutte contre les moteurs de recherche. Extraits:

  • Price adds that librarians need to take on a greater role as educators. "We haven’t done enough to show people there’s a difference between research and typing two and a half words into a search engine. We haven’t shown them that there are other specialized databases out there that can get them a better, more timely, more authoritative answer.
  • Vine. "I think librarians bring to the table an understanding of the nature of publishing. We know that some information might be in books, some might be in journals, others might be found in white papers or government documents. We’re able to take a more structured approach than the average person who doesn’t understand exactly how information happens."
  • "Librarians are great analysts," says Information Highways’ Web Search Alert columnist Gwen Harris. "Given the freedom to research a matter they’ll be very thorough and they’ll digest and rearrange and even do some interpretation."
  • Price adds that it’s the ability not just to present but to organize information that counts. "Google takes what it can find and throws it into a database — that’s not what I would consider organizing information."
  • Says Vine, "every librarian should have deprogramming training. I think librarians are very used to tools made for them by publishers. But those tools are only going to be purchased by libraries because libraries are the only ones that can afford them. Librarians don’t always understand that you also have to evaluate search content on the free Web and they’re not necessarily aware of the various business models that are at stake."
  • Armed with the knowledge of the accessible free Web, librarians can better compare it to their specialized databases that might produce results faster, and educate their patrons about these databases.
  • Two weeks ago I was talking with a reporter from Reuters and I went through the list of what the public library offers and you could actually hear her jaw drop. She said, ‘this is wonderful, useful, important stuff I can get to for free — why hasn’t anybody told me about this?
  • Because the world of information is so much more complex, there’s so much more product out there competing for your eyeballs and if you say ‘I’m not going to give you advice — I’m just going to show you how to do it yourself,’ people are going to walk away because it’s just so overwhelming."

L’article fini par les huits conseils ci-dessous:

1. Reach out to people who haven’t been in a library in many years. Point out that library services go way beyond the four walls of the library building.

2. Develop personal relationships with users. In the same way bankers used to know their customers’ needs, let people know you are "their" information go-to person.

3. Not only tell people we’re here, but why we’re here and precisely what we offer. The phrase "save them time" is a good place to begin.

4. Court people in gatekeeper roles like journalists and teachers and demonstrate what we can offer. In addition, let them know that you’re always ready to assist them. Helping them one or two times can do wonders.

5. Publicize librarian-created services, for example, general Web directories like the Librarians’ Index to the Internet, Infomine, and the Resource Discovery Network. Explain how important the editors of these services consider the quality of information.

6. Remind people that passing up the library might mean they end up paying for material the library offers them for free.

7. Clearly illustrate and demonstrate Google’s limitations but more importantly, demonstrate how you and your library can solve these problems.

8. Remind people that a link to a possible answer is still not an answer

.

Error happened.
Spread the love
        
Article précédentDe la personnalisation pour Rocket NewsArticle suivant Scrapbook, une extension Firefox pour capturer le web

Laisser un commentaire Annuler la réponse

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les indésirables. En savoir plus sur la façon dont les données de vos commentaires sont traitées.

RETROUVEZ-MOI SUR

CHRISTOPHE DESCHAMPS

IMG_8825_3Consultant et formateur en veille stratégique, intelligence économique et mindmapping depuis 15 ans

Articles récents

Informer en 2025 (IVb) : les raisons de la défiance (France)14 février 2025
Informer en 2025 (partie IV) : les raisons de la défiance (USA)13 février 2025
Informer en 2025 (partie III) : Qui fact-checkera les fact-checkeurs ?12 février 2025

Catégories

  • Concepts
  • Infos
  • Méthodologie
  • Non classé
  • Outils
  • Premiers pas
  • Réflexions
  • Ressource
  • Revue de liens

Étiquettes

AlertesMotsCles analyser l'information chatGPT collaboratif Collaborer ConserverLeWeb ContentDiscovery Curation Dataviz Diffuser l'information Désinformation ExtensionNavigateur Facebook GestionVideos GoogleChrome HtmlToRss Informer Inoreader Intelligence artificielle intelligence économique IST knowledge management Lecture LLMs MediasSociaux mindmapping MonitoringMediasSociaux MoteurDeRecherche OSINT Outil collaboratif Outils Froids personal knowledge management PKM Presse RecherchePersonne RechercheWeb RevueDeLiens RSS SurveillancePagesWeb SurveillanceSourcesWeb Tutoriel Twitter Veille VeilleVideo Video

DERNIERS TWEETS

Tweets by crid

Recevez les nouveaux articles de ce blog

Informer en 2025 (IVb) : les raisons de la défiance (France)14 février 2025
Informer en 2025 (partie IV) : les raisons de la défiance (USA)13 février 2025
Informer en 2025 (partie III) : Qui fact-checkera les fact-checkeurs ?12 février 2025

Abonnez-vous à notre newsletter

mentions-legales

Articles récents

Informer en 2025 (IVb) : les raisons de la défiance (France)14 février 2025
Informer en 2025 (partie IV) : les raisons de la défiance (USA)13 février 2025
Informer en 2025 (partie III) : Qui fact-checkera les fact-checkeurs ?12 février 2025

Catégories

  • Concepts
  • Infos
  • Méthodologie
  • Non classé
  • Outils
  • Premiers pas
  • Réflexions
  • Ressource
  • Revue de liens